05-07-2012, 01:53 PM
I have no problems with creating a new form, I have problems with trying to legitimize the form by appealing to it's supposed origins when at best there is only a superficial resemblance, or simply imposing it ad hoc. I think a form has to show legitimacy in relation to the language, in this case English, which has not historically fit well to small forms. I have yet to see anyone make a good case for such a form, nor have I seen a good example of it, and I have yet to see any profundity despite all the haughty arrogance of some of those who champion it. The sonnet, which is a borrowed form, took hundreds of years to produce good examples, and it is still to this day a difficult form due to the syntactical difficulties of writing in iambic pentameter (avoiding, what I have heard referred to as Yoda speech). Generally it is not a form quickly or easily handled owing to its foreign roots, although one cannot deny it has a place in English poetry owing to the extreme influence of Old French (Norman French 1066 CE) on the English language. English is neither a metrical or a syllabic language, but an accentual one, so I think one has quite a challenge at hand to justify why a short syllabic form is a good idea for English poetry.
"i wonder what a Japanese sonnet would look like ?"
As there is no such thing as iambic pentameter in Japanese, and I have no idea if rhyme makes any sense in the language, I would suppose it would look like what a haiku looks like in English, in the case of the sonnet, fourteen lines that are composed of 5 "on" each.
Dale
"i wonder what a Japanese sonnet would look like ?"
As there is no such thing as iambic pentameter in Japanese, and I have no idea if rhyme makes any sense in the language, I would suppose it would look like what a haiku looks like in English, in the case of the sonnet, fourteen lines that are composed of 5 "on" each.

Dale
How long after picking up the brush, the first masterpiece?
The goal is not to obfuscate that which is clear, but make clear that which isn't.
The goal is not to obfuscate that which is clear, but make clear that which isn't.

