11-17-2011, 05:46 PM
I don't think it's the schools' responibility to feed its students. If parents are worried about their children's diets then they should feed them themselves, and take the time to make them a healthy packed lunch. Why should a school spend money which could be spent on books and computers doing what parents are too lazy to? They're there to teach kids, not raise them. Should educators also be responsible for cleaning the students' uniforms and kissing them goodnight?
As for poor kids who depend on school lunches, I'm going to sound really callous here but I think if you can't afford to feed your children you shouldn't be having them. Of course what you should and shouldn't do doesn't stop people, and it isn't the child's fault that its parents were too lazy or stupid to even use contraceptives.
As for poor kids who depend on school lunches, I'm going to sound really callous here but I think if you can't afford to feed your children you shouldn't be having them. Of course what you should and shouldn't do doesn't stop people, and it isn't the child's fault that its parents were too lazy or stupid to even use contraceptives.
"We believe that we invent symbols. The truth is that they invent us; we are their creatures, shaped by their hard, defining edges." - Gene Wolfe