Right to death

[heslopian]

does it? i haven't killed any kids lately, how about you, (no offence meant )
deprivation of freedom doesn't mean putting you in prison, not in the uk where these two are at least. it basically take away one freedom, the right to wholly take part in society; one can still interact in many ways within society even though one is incarcerated.
you still have most of your freedoms in tact inside prison.

the prison population has it's own society and it's that that they shouldn't be allowed to partake in, they should in fact have their tongues cut out so they can't even talk to the prison guards, back to the revenge thing no punishment can be enough to be called justice in these cases. they by their own actions have stepped outside justice and as such, do not even deserve the toughest of justice which is death. they only deserve to live by their own code of horror and torture in similar conditions to their victims.

vf: the question concerns a case about british prisoners in a british jail system. which is what i replied too.

normally i believe in the death sentence but in this instant and others like it,...

when the same question is asked of yank prisoners your reply will be warranted.

I doubt Brady is allowed much time to mingle among other prisoners and conduct a social life. He'd be torn to shreds by the other inmates if put in a normal prison.
You say he stepped outside the bounds of justice. Fine, I agree. He moved beyond the bounds of justice when he started killing kids. But that doesn't mean we should follow him. As good, rational people we should stay behind the line, otherwise society would descend into moral chaos.
All this talk of cutting out his tongue, what does it achieve? Those children are still dead, their surviving families still live in agony. The only purpose of such torture would be personal pleasure, in the same way Brady took personal pleasure in raping and torturing his victims.