wikileaks founder such a nice guy

[billy]

i think i can pretty much guarantee that when the Swedish prosecutors decided tpb should be prosecuted, everyone including myself voiced an opinion that the Swedish prosecutors were incompetent, inept and in no way able to tell right from wrong based on them prosecuting tpb.

did i miss something, did something change over the last year that made them capable and intelligent?

Lots of people did say they were incompetent. But...they...won. They successfully prosecuted people whom you (and I) believe to be innocent.

You can make a case for them being biased, perhaps even corrupt, but incompetent? Unfortunately not.

And this case is exactly the opposite. Given an individual in many ways comparable to the TPB 4, whom you're arguing is guilty, you're saying they let off without even trying.

Your argument is self-contradicting.

i said;
the Swedish prosecutors were incompetent, inept and in no way able to tell right from wrong based on them prosecuting tpb.

meaning if that is the case, then the chances of them being right when they say he's innocent seems to be very small. given their propensity for getting the truth wrong, one could safely bet on them being wrong.
the fact they managed to get a conviction on innocent people not only shows them tp be inept (they're supposed to prosecute those who are perceived to be guilty) but also deceitful