a mosque at ground zero

[altezon]

Since we're serious, let's be accurate. There is no "Cordoba Group" associated with the project.

actually to say "cordoba group" as a group of people who invest under the name " cordoba whatever" is semantics. it is being made to look like the "cordoba whatever" are the main investors and sometimes the only investors.

It isn't semantics when you're making the identity of these people a focus by maligning their intent.

Many businesses call themselves, "The Cordoba Group", e.g.:

http://cordobagroup.com/
http://www.manta.com/c/mmy1lx9/cordoba-group-inc
http://www.cordobagroup.co.uk/

None of these have any connection with Cordoba House.

Your ravings about the muslim peril have been totally unverifiable. If you insist on this argument without supporting it with something other than paranoid speculation, I don't see how you can expect me to take you seriously.

i don't expect anything from you, to expect me too seems rather impish of you.
i put my opinions forward and you accept them or you don't .

Right, I'll rephrase: Oh please, could you support your ravings about the
muslim peril with something other than paranoid speculation? Thanks so much.

Sorry, but you can't define bureaucracy as

if they don't like they kill it with red tape. it's called bureaucracy

... and then switch to a dictionary definition that doesn't include malicious intent.

actually i just did, or did you miss that part? in fact bureaucracy is often not bureaucracy unless it's used with malicious intent.

You may have a point there.

Your apparent eagerness to see the project fail is repugnant.

and i shall lose sleep because of it? should another project come to the for which isn't in anyway connected with hammas it would have my full support

zahir spoke on cnn as a rep of the cordoba house project. that none of soho investors stood up and said "sorry he doesn't speak on our behalf"
leads me (not you, or anyone else, but me) to believe the project isn't as
full of universal love as has been projected.

As far as I can tell, Zahar endorsed the project without claiming to be its representative.
Perhaps no one disputed Zahar's connection because he hadn't claimed any.
Since you're the one shoveling crap on the people involved with the project,
you should be the one to present credible evidence that they deserve it. So look it up.
Your carelessness with details makes your unsupported recollection suspect.

I'm not done with you yet.

as for you not finishing with me. i have to prove you wrong by no further replying to you in these threads. i am already spoken for as someone elses dog.
have a good day debating with yourself

Well said. But I still invite you to back up what you say or have the courage to alter your position.

source;
nice plan if it works. set american against american in order to generate donations.

Rauf is an American. If this orchestrated bigotry runs his project out of town it will be a tragedy for our country.