a mosque at ground zero

[billy]

you said;

Since we're serious, let's be accurate. There is no "Cordoba Group" associated with the project.

actually to say "cordoba group" as a group of people who invest under the name " cordoba whatever" is semantics. it is being made to look like the "cordoba whatever" are the main investors and sometimes the only investors.

Your ravings about the muslim peril have been totally unverifiable. If you insist on this argument without supporting it with something other than paranoid speculation, I don't see how you can expect me to take you seriously.

i don't expect anything from you, to expect me too seems rather impish of you. i put my opinions forward and you accept them or you don't

Sorry, but you can't define bureaucracy as

if they don't like they kill it with red tape. it's called bureaucracy

... and then switch to a dictionary definition that doesn't include malicious intent.

actually i just did, or did you miss that part? in fact bureaucracy is often not bureaucracy unless it's used with malicious intent. to think otherwise is asinine

And your apparent eagerness to see the project fail is repugnant.

and i shall lose sleep because of it? should another project come to the for which isn't in anyway connected with hammas it would have my full support

zahir spoke on cnn as a rep of the cordoba house project. that none of soho investors stood up and said "sorry he doesn't speak on our behalf"
leads me (not you, or anyone else, but me) to believe the project isn't as
full of universal love as has been projected.

I'm not done with you yet.

as for you not finishing with me. i have to prove you wrong by no further replying to you in these threads. i am already spoken for as someone elses dog.

have a good day debating with yourself