08-03-2010, 11:25 AM
leaks like that yes.
but the main stuff is about troop deployment field tactics etc.
as well as which afgahanistani informed on what.
and thats what i'm saying. all anyone is interested in is which collateral damage was done by armed forces.
they don't believe intelligence can be gathered from such a long period of maneuvers and tactics.
in fact the generals were the ones who new the most about the opposing force's tactics. the taliban have been hand a lot of that on a plate. and i still say the wiki guy on the news is in it for the glory he just wants fame. he doesn't give a fuck about any truths.
i also agree that embedded journalists will not be unbiased.
but the main stuff is about troop deployment field tactics etc.
as well as which afgahanistani informed on what.
and thats what i'm saying. all anyone is interested in is which collateral damage was done by armed forces.
they don't believe intelligence can be gathered from such a long period of maneuvers and tactics.
in fact the generals were the ones who new the most about the opposing force's tactics. the taliban have been hand a lot of that on a plate. and i still say the wiki guy on the news is in it for the glory he just wants fame. he doesn't give a fuck about any truths.
i also agree that embedded journalists will not be unbiased.