07-29-2010, 11:16 AM
i have to agree moobs
but my point is this. if they don't (talkinking about the top brass here btw)
is it right to print something that could cause death to others.
plus, the major share of the leaks wasn't about the cock ups.
most were just about general reporting of actions and situation.
i watched a TED talk this morning that said;
when anne nicole smith dies it accounted for about 60% of news stories on the main media channels.
the real news; pakistan and all the other really important stuff gets put aside. for me thats whats happening with the leaks. though only a small percent relate to collateral deaths they're taking being taken up as the whole thing. sad as collateral deaths are. and i wish they're weren't any. there's a lot more leeks been published that have nothing to do with that. there's a lot more happening out there on the ground that has nothing to do wit that. somebody wears a waistcoat to church and in doing so kills ten or twenty people.
something thats basically happening every single day in that region but guess what. all thats really in the new is the fuckin wikileaks.
we talk about collateral deaths as though they're just that, fuck it who cares it's just collateral shit. well yes, lets really talk about it . wtf? it's all i see on the news (apart from BP) i want to know whats happening in pakistand and khandahar, in iraq and iran. i don't just need to know about collateral damage. but i have no say so the 3, 6, 12 or 20 civilians the arny kill gets 80% percent more airtime than the 10, 20, 30, or 80 innocents their own countrymen kill.
and as for the smarmy cunt who did the wiki ad on cnn (appeared) i seriously don't belive the fucker. he doesn't give a flying fuck about transparency that bastard wants fame. the hunger for it was oozing out of the fucker, i swear.
but my point is this. if they don't (talkinking about the top brass here btw)
is it right to print something that could cause death to others.
plus, the major share of the leaks wasn't about the cock ups.
most were just about general reporting of actions and situation.
i watched a TED talk this morning that said;
when anne nicole smith dies it accounted for about 60% of news stories on the main media channels.
the real news; pakistan and all the other really important stuff gets put aside. for me thats whats happening with the leaks. though only a small percent relate to collateral deaths they're taking being taken up as the whole thing. sad as collateral deaths are. and i wish they're weren't any. there's a lot more leeks been published that have nothing to do with that. there's a lot more happening out there on the ground that has nothing to do wit that. somebody wears a waistcoat to church and in doing so kills ten or twenty people.
something thats basically happening every single day in that region but guess what. all thats really in the new is the fuckin wikileaks.
we talk about collateral deaths as though they're just that, fuck it who cares it's just collateral shit. well yes, lets really talk about it . wtf? it's all i see on the news (apart from BP) i want to know whats happening in pakistand and khandahar, in iraq and iran. i don't just need to know about collateral damage. but i have no say so the 3, 6, 12 or 20 civilians the arny kill gets 80% percent more airtime than the 10, 20, 30, or 80 innocents their own countrymen kill.
and as for the smarmy cunt who did the wiki ad on cnn (appeared) i seriously don't belive the fucker. he doesn't give a flying fuck about transparency that bastard wants fame. the hunger for it was oozing out of the fucker, i swear.