alternate big bang theories

[altezon]

i know he's called hawking but tell that to my keyboard

as it stands. time begins at the point of the singularity (big bang)
some, specially the patch workers don't agree;

This potentially means that many of the black holes in our own universe are the incubators of entirely new universes, each separated by the infinite time gap of the event horizon. That said, some properties of the mother universe could trickle through to its daughters, and detecting some of these properties could actually provide experimental proof of the theory. In fact Poplawski speculates this inheritance of properties could solve another great mystery of cosmology.;

The so-called arrow of time, in which time flows in one direction but not another, is a fundamental aspect of our experience. This isn't accounted for at all by physics, as all of its laws are apparently time-symmetric in that they work just as well whether time flows forwards or backwards. However, the passage of matter through the event horizon would provide a time asymmetry in the new universe, giving it a forward arrow to time. In that way, time itself is a gift of our mother universe on the other side of the black hole.

like HAWKING's radiation that seeps from a black hole. the patchwork theorist think some particles from the mother universe could trickle through into the singularity (the new big bang). if these could be seen the same as HAWKING's radiation, it would show how time moves forward after a big bang

i'm really out of my depth here so i would take what i say with more than a pinch of salt.

Phooey. Looks like yer boy "Pop" Poplawski has been in the news recently http://www.thepittsburghchannel.com/news...etail.html Seems a bit young to be talking about causal patches, but I'll research whatcher on about to get a better handle on it.

EDIT:

addy's source in a previous post states;

Under normal circumstances, this is just an interesting bit of math, and torsion doesn't really affect anything. However, if densities are increased tremendously, then torsion has some very significant effects. Most intriguingly, torsion makes it impossible for black holes to form singularities. And if singularities are impossible, then what's at the center of black holes?

I'd like to see as much detail of the theories you're citing as you can provide me, but the links don't show much. Apparently I have to buy the articles if I want to read them.

if indeed black holes are the birthing place of new universe (in addy's source again) the mr hawkins could have gotten it wrong and Hawkins radiation isn't as widespread as he suggested. maybe the black holes disappearing (evaporating) is a by process of creating a new universe. something which can't exists in our own universe. (it has to evaporate or disappear.)

Hawking radiation apparently hasn't been detected yet, so proposing another reason for it is premature.