alternate big bang theories

[altezon]

the big crunch is the or was the current theory.

not the theory but a possible scenario, depending on determination of the deceleration parameter 'q', which in turn awaited an accurate determination of the mass of the universe. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deceleration_parameter

the hypothesis i put up isn't the big crunch theory per say

I know, but the cyclic theory depends on a crunch. If the universe keeps expanding forever, obviously the cyclic theory is out. The last I heard, new data indicated an accelerating expansion that ruled out recollapse. No collapse, no cycle. But perhaps it's not as certain as I thought.

the big crunch postulates that the universe in its death creates another universe.

Not necessarily . Just a singularity.

the theory up top creates a large amount of different universe.

I got that. An "infinite number" is a large amount. Problem is, infinity isn't a number. Whatever number you can think of, infinity is bigger than that. But no number has the property of being bigger than every other number. So an infinite anything is bullshit. If you bother to count or measure anything, numbers is all you can use. "More than" an actual number is acceptable. Otherwise you have to say, "Duh, I don't know".

In physical cosmology, the Big Crunch is one possible scenario for the ultimate fate of the universe, in which the metric expansion of space eventually reverses and the universe recollapses, ultimately ending as a black hole singularity.

Right -- not another universe but a singularity.

-------------------------
addy's: the black hole theory.
addy's source:

the reason this thread about was because of theory in addy's source;

she shown it me and so i decided to find a counter theory.
i actually like her theory better because it allows a time line to be traversed both ways without entropy.

My brain hurts.