06-07-2023, 12:53 AM
The poet is sexually attractive and has a famous father. Her last name is Tamas, one of the Gunas. Guna means Thread. Ever changing. The witch is in with the nonhuman, the Government and its Technology is also nonhuman, but the witch seems sure. She lets me call her a witch. Is she smug in her craft, or proud in her tantra? The poet is sexually attractive, she was born in 1988.
Nature and Technology, are they compatible, being the same? Does Imagination become roaring raging Conservative Overlord; does the horned man of the green?
Which which is a witch?
The poet says this:
"I’ve been researching the Ancient Greek cult of Dionysus recently, and in doing so, have been thinking more and more about the importance of mystery and alterity in building a sense of solidarity and intimacy with the nonhuman world. Dionysus, the ‘hidden god’, seems to represent/allow an access to what is beyond the human that revivifies and transforms, a connection to the violent difference of the nonhuman that is electrifying. So much of our lives are spent in the carapace of the entirely human, whether in cities, or in a countryside shaped by agriculture. To witness radical difference, to recognise the agency of wild things, without idealising them, can restore to us the sense of living in a diverse and unpredictable universe. To me that is an immanent rather than a divine mystery, that allows us to feel a genuine joy in a connection to a wider life force that exists beyond our own limiting conceptions. That perhaps sounds a little sentimental too, but I’m not quite sure how else to put it into words!"
I, with more than a bit of the smug chaos she disdains, am certain how to put it into words. You can put anything into words.
I want to say that she is only published because she is attractive and has a famous father, not because I dismiss her, but because if I met her, I'd want to attract her through her hatred. For her to seethe in my poetry of Irreverence. That is the best. That is how I operate smoothly. Love burns longer through rage which is heavier and deeper on a carnal level than cutsie fruitsie wedding vows and apartment sharing. The most heinous divorces are corrupted by a love deferred.
Nature and Technology, are they compatible, being the same? Does Imagination become roaring raging Conservative Overlord; does the horned man of the green?
Which which is a witch?
The poet says this:
"I’ve been researching the Ancient Greek cult of Dionysus recently, and in doing so, have been thinking more and more about the importance of mystery and alterity in building a sense of solidarity and intimacy with the nonhuman world. Dionysus, the ‘hidden god’, seems to represent/allow an access to what is beyond the human that revivifies and transforms, a connection to the violent difference of the nonhuman that is electrifying. So much of our lives are spent in the carapace of the entirely human, whether in cities, or in a countryside shaped by agriculture. To witness radical difference, to recognise the agency of wild things, without idealising them, can restore to us the sense of living in a diverse and unpredictable universe. To me that is an immanent rather than a divine mystery, that allows us to feel a genuine joy in a connection to a wider life force that exists beyond our own limiting conceptions. That perhaps sounds a little sentimental too, but I’m not quite sure how else to put it into words!"
I, with more than a bit of the smug chaos she disdains, am certain how to put it into words. You can put anything into words.
I want to say that she is only published because she is attractive and has a famous father, not because I dismiss her, but because if I met her, I'd want to attract her through her hatred. For her to seethe in my poetry of Irreverence. That is the best. That is how I operate smoothly. Love burns longer through rage which is heavier and deeper on a carnal level than cutsie fruitsie wedding vows and apartment sharing. The most heinous divorces are corrupted by a love deferred.