05-27-2021, 02:29 AM
: Example
There are no problems,
there are solutions and problems. Seems pretty obvious
The solutions make problems
for the sakes of the solutions,
not for the sakes of the problems. I agree that solutions can be troublesome. That said, there are many solutions (especially scientific, eg vaccines) that in fact, are "for the sakes of the problems"
The problems are traps solutions set to catch themselves. I'm trying to follow, but the faulty pro-noun referent (themselves) seems to be a trap, and I can't make sense of it.
Problems are minority groups. Whatever they may-be. Hmm, in reverse equivalence then "minority groups are problems"
I'm guessing that was poem #1
Gods and others. all others?
If you resist, you are non-GOD. I don't resist, but I'm still non-God
the violation of the rules is part of the poem.
and I'm not. anyway , This is very unclear...
Not violating
Rube Icon
I say there is no Evil. It ain't up to you, I'm afraid, and you will know evil when you see it, or it sees you.
God says there is. Many claim God speaks in their language.
Well.
Was that poem #2?
If so, then I guess poem #3 is next:
Tao is Bullshit and Bullshit is Tasty Haven't tried it myself
We think it is hard,
[ Ex: It's not soft either ]
Tao is bullshit, and cowshit is
a matter of taste. This means something to you, I guess, but it's way to obscure for my tasteless brain
Well, owens, I am once again stumped. I'm sure you'll be able to clarify for me, and I hope your clarifications will make more sense than these poems
There are no problems,
there are solutions and problems. Seems pretty obvious
The solutions make problems
for the sakes of the solutions,
not for the sakes of the problems. I agree that solutions can be troublesome. That said, there are many solutions (especially scientific, eg vaccines) that in fact, are "for the sakes of the problems"
The problems are traps solutions set to catch themselves. I'm trying to follow, but the faulty pro-noun referent (themselves) seems to be a trap, and I can't make sense of it.
Problems are minority groups. Whatever they may-be. Hmm, in reverse equivalence then "minority groups are problems"
I'm guessing that was poem #1
Gods and others. all others?
If you resist, you are non-GOD. I don't resist, but I'm still non-God
the violation of the rules is part of the poem.
and I'm not. anyway , This is very unclear...
Not violating
Rube Icon
I say there is no Evil. It ain't up to you, I'm afraid, and you will know evil when you see it, or it sees you.
God says there is. Many claim God speaks in their language.
Well.
Was that poem #2?
If so, then I guess poem #3 is next:
Tao is Bullshit and Bullshit is Tasty Haven't tried it myself
We think it is hard,
[ Ex: It's not soft either ]
Tao is bullshit, and cowshit is
a matter of taste. This means something to you, I guess, but it's way to obscure for my tasteless brain
Well, owens, I am once again stumped. I'm sure you'll be able to clarify for me, and I hope your clarifications will make more sense than these poems