01-01-2021, 06:00 AM
"I point out, mildly, that "none of the cases held up in court" is incorrect. None has actually been *tried* in court, all (but one?) have been denied a hearing using one rationalization or another."
Let's not nit-pick. It is a spurious argument to say they have not won because they were not heard. Considering that these cases have been thrown out from lack of evidence in courts all across the United States mostly with Republican appointed judges, it seems difficult to fathom that lack of courage is the cause. It seems much more likely that lack of evidence was indeed the cause. To pursue this idea of conspiracy is neither rational or logical. The bottom line is there is nothing to investigate.
dale
Let's not nit-pick. It is a spurious argument to say they have not won because they were not heard. Considering that these cases have been thrown out from lack of evidence in courts all across the United States mostly with Republican appointed judges, it seems difficult to fathom that lack of courage is the cause. It seems much more likely that lack of evidence was indeed the cause. To pursue this idea of conspiracy is neither rational or logical. The bottom line is there is nothing to investigate.
dale
How long after picking up the brush, the first masterpiece?
The goal is not to obfuscate that which is clear, but make clear that which isn't.
The goal is not to obfuscate that which is clear, but make clear that which isn't.