12-30-2020, 05:37 AM
I take whatever the talking heads say with a large grain of salt.I was generally basing it on statements of Republicans who have said it was a secure election, that and the 52 court cases that Trump and his allies have lost regarding fraud. His own security guy said this was the most secure election there has been.Of course Trump fired him after he said it. McConnell has even congratulated Biden on winning the election and asks the Republican Senators not to disrupt the formal counting of the Electorate. I am a moderate and really have no dog in this race, however I do take it seriously when someone is trying to overturn votes and get their guys to throw out the electoral college and replace it with their own electorate. That Biden (who I don't personally care for) won by such a large amount in both the popular vote and the electoral college makes me think the fraud would be pretty obvious and it is not. That and a large portion of the courts that heard the cases were packed by Republican appointees, not to mention the Supreme Court.
I look at your link just the same, but unless it has strong supporting evidence I doubt I will be swayed.
dale
_______________________________________________________________________________
Duke,
I have read the article and found it to be unsupported conjecture. When it does quote sources, they are from articles in far right wing magazines such as "Epoch Times" or "OAN," to name two; who are themselves only reporting conjecture. Oftentimes it quotes itself, and when it refers to its own made up charts (it gives no supporting evidence for these charts, merely stating them as fact).
At one point in the article it referred to 50 cases as evidence, it failed to say they had only won, one of these cases and at present that number is 1 of 52. To me this article is dishonestly written, this does not mean that articles from the left are not equally dishonest, but we are discussing this one.
Not only did I see no evidence to persuade me, I saw no evidence at all. Sorry
dale
I look at your link just the same, but unless it has strong supporting evidence I doubt I will be swayed.
dale
_______________________________________________________________________________
Duke,
I have read the article and found it to be unsupported conjecture. When it does quote sources, they are from articles in far right wing magazines such as "Epoch Times" or "OAN," to name two; who are themselves only reporting conjecture. Oftentimes it quotes itself, and when it refers to its own made up charts (it gives no supporting evidence for these charts, merely stating them as fact).
At one point in the article it referred to 50 cases as evidence, it failed to say they had only won, one of these cases and at present that number is 1 of 52. To me this article is dishonestly written, this does not mean that articles from the left are not equally dishonest, but we are discussing this one.
Not only did I see no evidence to persuade me, I saw no evidence at all. Sorry
dale
How long after picking up the brush, the first masterpiece?
The goal is not to obfuscate that which is clear, but make clear that which isn't.
The goal is not to obfuscate that which is clear, but make clear that which isn't.