08-04-2020, 08:03 AM
@Keith - thanks for the critique. I appreciate the point of view, but saving electricity/other resources wasn't quite the point of the work (to me). It might be more, but your reading is perfectly fine. We don't get to choose readers' interpretations, only hope for them.
@busker - also thanks. You're right, those two lines are weak, informal, and banal. But I'd contend that they're a necessary transition to the resource question, which would be abrupt, even puzzling on first read without them. I certainly do need to improve them, though, and for that, thanks again!
@busker - also thanks. You're right, those two lines are weak, informal, and banal. But I'd contend that they're a necessary transition to the resource question, which would be abrupt, even puzzling on first read without them. I certainly do need to improve them, though, and for that, thanks again!
Non-practicing atheist