01-27-2020, 01:56 AM
Thanks. Definitely food for thought.
(01-26-2020, 08:20 PM)Knot Wrote: .
Hi bbc,it really comes into its own in the final five stanzas (or so), but the opening is a bit too dry.Why are bikinis 'appropriately black'? I was also confused with how much the watercourse represented Kenjockty, or vice versa(and the deliberate(?) omission of Creek from the title didn't help).That you don't start the piece at the 'source' but somewhere in/under Buffalo, might require an explanation.
Some of the phrasing could be improved, for instanceby his Seneca nameSka-dyoh-gwa-deh“Beyond the Multitude”the creek would later be calledthe (bold) construction is too convoluted, I think.
and some parts just seem included for information, rather than 'value', e.g.we no longer needed your famous grasses for your once famous basketsyour role to defeat the British, no longer matteredyou could edit that stanza toI just didn’t carethat at your mouth gatheredlong-forgotten ancestors
I'd suggest beginning with 'two miles downstream' (though, downstream from what?), and move from past to present over thecourse of the piece (and end on 'forgive').
Best, Knot
.

