08-29-2019, 06:40 AM
(08-29-2019, 06:18 AM)dukealien Wrote: As Einstein remarked when told that a hundred scientists disagreed with him, "Why a hundred? One is enough if he proves I am wrong."Well observed that you are no Einstein.
I'm no Einstein, but I do know how (real) science works. Also how calling skepticism "denialism" is supposed to work, that is, to shut down discussion. I've found that trying to conduct a reasoned discussion with a climate "scientist" or global warming true-believer is like trying to pass a garbage truck whilst riding a bicycle: the harder you pedal, the worse the stench becomes.
Have a pleasant day.
And you are wrong again in this instance, as it appears you have based your conclusions on a single Forbes article, essentially outsourcing critical thinking to a single journalist. I’m not sure that’s how real science works.
Can you please backup your claim that rainforests don’t burn? I’m rather interested in the real science behind that, especially as I travel to Indonesia quite often and I’m sure the natives would like to know.
Have an amazing rest of the week.
I’m also interested in learning how your qualifications stack up against those of any one of these “scientists” at random: http://www.ccrc.unsw.edu.au/ccrc-team

