Art for Art's sake
#4
Before anyone points out the semantic flaw in my argument. Yes I believe that the art of art, the art of politics, the art of psychology, yes these are abstract subjects that artists have to fill in. I support abstract in that sense. I don't support or not support the abstract notions of groups of people. I make fun of groups of people all the time, because a group is an abstraction. I make fun of individuals too, but why not?

As for the comment above me. We need narratives. Some people pick a religion. Some pick a political thing. I just can't. . . . And I wish I could make music. Instrumental music. Something that has no verbal/intellectual context. Just sound that can let me release my tension and emotions until I don't need to anymore. But then some group would just claim that the notes and chords were arranged in a way that spelled out something satanic. And I mean satanic in a secular sense, and a religious sense. And I mean religious in several senses: any that you can think or feel of.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Art for Art's sake - by rowens - 03-21-2019, 01:30 AM
RE: Art for Art's sake - by CRNDLSM - 03-21-2019, 03:36 AM
RE: Art for Art's sake - by alonso ramoran - 03-21-2019, 04:28 AM
RE: Art for Art's sake - by rowens - 03-21-2019, 04:57 AM
RE: Art for Art's sake - by billy - 03-21-2019, 07:11 AM
RE: Art for Art's sake - by rowens - 03-21-2019, 07:26 AM
RE: Art for Art's sake - by CRNDLSM - 03-21-2019, 08:56 AM
RE: Art for Art's sake - by billy - 03-21-2019, 11:34 AM
RE: Art for Art's sake - by rowens - 03-21-2019, 09:23 AM
RE: Art for Art's sake - by rowens - 03-21-2019, 12:39 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!