march against immigration law
#6
(05-03-2010, 08:32 AM)Benny2guns Wrote:  
(05-03-2010, 06:32 AM)SidewaysDan Wrote:  Sorry, I'll rephrase to illegal immigrants.

And Hillary Clinton raised a very good point - "“Clearly, as I understand the way the law is being explained, if you’re a legal resident, you still have to carry papers,” she said. “Well, how is a law enforcement official supposed to know” whether someone might be an illegal visitor, she asked."

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2010/05/02...ntroversy/

It's not very well thought out. And I said what I said because if you look at the comments on the yahoo page you will see the attittude.
The proper term would be illegel alien Dan.
As far as how they would know one to see one, thats simple, the same way law enforcement gets most of their information, rats, squeelers, informants and the like. Tips hotline, you know what I am talking about. There is a big to do about nothing as I see it.
The fact is the law was made to draw attention to the fact that each state can in fact make their own laws. I am pretty darn sure this is the real reason for them doing it.
the big to do is because they aren't doing it the way you say benny.

going off an informant, or hotline tip etc, is fine by me. it's how they catch all manner of lawbreakers.

the point of contention is the fact that they get stopped purely on the basis of race for immigration purposes.

he's a latino, he's probably an illegal...
the truth is people of all races can and are entering the usa illegally

the person who made the law stated that it was made because other laws were not working.

other laws which basically give them the same rights they get from the new law but under a different wording (sometimes it's about how it's worded)

many are saying the law was made as a political move. (the governor wants to keep his seat and the chief of the sheriffs dept want to stay head. they know everyone in arizona and their cat will vote for someone who makes such a law irrespective of it violating human rights.

that part about every man has the right to the pursuit of happiness, and all men are equal (unless you have a brown or black skin) etc.

like i said, i think it will backfire whatever the reason for the law.

the majority of people believe that human rights are important.

and as vf has stated.

the immigration dept deal with immigration on a federal level.
it's in the constitution.

the fact is the law they made is illegal and will probably be overturned as such. they are not the immigration dept per say.


Messages In This Thread
march against immigration law - by billy - 05-02-2010, 08:33 AM
RE: march against immigration law - by mrmod - 05-03-2010, 01:26 AM
RE: march against immigration law - by Benny2guns - 05-03-2010, 02:00 AM
RE: march against immigration law - by mrmod - 05-03-2010, 06:32 AM
RE: march against immigration law - by Benny2guns - 05-03-2010, 08:32 AM
RE: march against immigration law - by billy - 05-03-2010, 10:52 AM
RE: march against immigration law - by Benny2guns - 05-03-2010, 11:12 AM
RE: march against immigration law - by billy - 05-03-2010, 11:23 AM
RE: march against immigration law - by Benny2guns - 05-03-2010, 06:43 PM
RE: march against immigration law - by DUBLIN5 - 05-03-2010, 07:12 PM
RE: march against immigration law - by Benny2guns - 05-04-2010, 05:49 AM
RE: march against immigration law - by billy - 05-04-2010, 09:26 AM



Users browsing this thread:
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!