Poems that can't be made better by using more than three words
#74
(07-31-2016, 11:28 AM)Pdeathstar Wrote:  that belongs in poetry for prays....
true. you win Sad  curse you sartre!!!

(07-31-2016, 11:32 AM)lizziep Wrote:  
(07-31-2016, 09:34 AM)shemthepenman Wrote:  i am not denying it cannot be read as a poem. and one can most certainly interpret it many different way. but if three effectively random words constitute a poem, then we're all wasting our time.
You think we're all wasting our time all of the time. Tongue

Maybe we could judge it on length, like:

shemthepenman's
supercalifragilisticexpialidocious
floccinaucinihilipilification
yeah, you're right. but i'm a nihilist, what can you do?
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Poems that can't be made better by using more than three words - by shemthepenman - 07-31-2016, 12:08 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site!