Do not be cross with poetry

[QDeathstar]

m

well, I disagree.  I think understanding a poem is key to enjoying it. Not understanding a poem is like being unable to see porn, just hearing random groans and being generally confused as to what is actually going on.

I can't say with any certainty if that itself is good or bad. I do not believe meaning is necessary to critique,

your statements are contradictory.

I have seen poems posted here that have an obvious depth, but that are beyond my scope. These are usually too intimidating, and for the time, I pass them by.

eg, if you don't understand them you can't critique them in any worth while manner.

Thus, poetry of birds and trees might be about a failing relationship, but it may also be porn that you hear but do not see.

yes, and that makes the poem or the porn much less enjoyable for the one who partakes but cannot see.

---

A masterpiece is just another peice of paper to the blind.