04-10-2016, 12:55 PM
Their prose are a form of opposition. That's what I had in mind.
I get the general idea, but "con" is an opposition to something. They bridge the gap with violent cons = with violent arguments against bridging the gap of yesteryear?
That's the only meaning that can be inferred from the sentence as it stands.
For the pun to work, I think you need to continue after "con" in the next line and talk about what is being argued against.
I get the general idea, but "con" is an opposition to something. They bridge the gap with violent cons = with violent arguments against bridging the gap of yesteryear?
That's the only meaning that can be inferred from the sentence as it stands.
For the pun to work, I think you need to continue after "con" in the next line and talk about what is being argued against.
~ I think I just quoted myself - Achebe

