03-30-2016, 06:03 PM
(03-27-2016, 11:10 PM)Erthona Wrote: The Myth of SisyphusDale,
(apologies to Camus)
I was at the Jobcentre;
they cut off my legs
then told me to run
to my next appointment
or I would get sanctioned.
erthona
©2016
I've read this over a few times now and have wondered how best to reply. The title is interesting, although I am unsure whether the apology to Camus is a way of saying that 'The Myth of Sisyphus' is reference to his use of the the myth or if it indeed is just an apology for using the same metaphor as him, I don't think that it is necessary.
"they cut off my legs" fits in well with the title and Camus' ideas of the 'absurdity' of life, although if it is a metaphor it would seem like it is almost the same metaphor as rolling a rock up a hill in the way that Sisyphus had to. So have you used two metaphors to explain the same situation? Or is it Sisyphus that is getting his legs cut off? It is unclear because both options are a possibility. I like the idea of Sisyphus being the one going to the Jobcentre, this would add to the 'absurd' aspect of the poem.
Just a couple of points on the wording - In the first line I would use the slang word 'Dole' instead of 'Jobcentre' although I appreciate that this would also mean adding a note of explanation.
For the last line I would go with 'be sanctioned' as it seems more of a natural way of saying it. Having said that a British person would be more likely to say 'or my benefits would be stopped', although I understand why you have used the word 'sanction'.
Perhaps you could use sanction in the title... "The Sanction of Sisyphus" or hmmm just a thought.
Interesting read. I've found it hard not to comment on the actual subject matter as it is a system I know very well and do feel quite passionate about.
Thanks for the read,
Mark
wae aye man ye radgie
