02-08-2016, 11:50 PM
That's been pointed out to me before. But I keep doing it, where the word effect isn't strong enough for what I mean. I want the correct definitions of both nouns to come together. The argument that someone just can't make up their own rules with language doesn't phase me. Plus I think I saw Carl Jung use the word affect in the way I did, but that could have been because nobody cared what he was talking about anyway.
Assumptious and using that instead of who are two other words I have been commonly questioned about. Maybe that's a style of speech that's not allowed.
Assumptious and using that instead of who are two other words I have been commonly questioned about. Maybe that's a style of speech that's not allowed.