03-25-2010, 04:35 PM
just read the source.
so basically the max is 2000 plus per houshold. wouldn't it be better not to pay and then just pay the irs the 2500
a lot cheaper than paying for a premium to cover the family.
one point i would make is this. how many companies will keep their workforce below 50.
for me i think an insurance tax taken form source on a sliding scale would be better.
then when you go to hospital your treatment is paid for by the gov. only self employed people would have to pay the tax at the end of the year. every one else has it deducted.
as for costing ten bill. someone needs to kick a bit of arse at the irs.
so basically the max is 2000 plus per houshold. wouldn't it be better not to pay and then just pay the irs the 2500
a lot cheaper than paying for a premium to cover the family.
one point i would make is this. how many companies will keep their workforce below 50.
for me i think an insurance tax taken form source on a sliding scale would be better.
then when you go to hospital your treatment is paid for by the gov. only self employed people would have to pay the tax at the end of the year. every one else has it deducted.
as for costing ten bill. someone needs to kick a bit of arse at the irs.