Which is more important?

[milo]

I find it interesting that some people read nuances in my statements that aren't there. Never once did I even imply that I have something so unique as to be unquestionable. I merely stated that I analyze the critiques I receive and move on, either taking or leaving the suggestions given. Some of them have been inspiring and have led me to want to change some things. Others don't do that and I simply move forward. In both cases, I read what is written to me, absorb it, analyze it, and move on, regardless of how inspired or uninspired I am by the critiques. I am sorry if you take offense to this, and I am sorry if that somehow leads you to believe that I am some egotist. However, if you feel the way you do~~~then feel that way. I have explained myself several times in ways I can't help but feel are rather clear, but I tire of having to defend myself when I simply gave a simple input.

---

You think the great Dennis Hammes wrote the rules.for you?

Wow, super narcissist alert!

Now think these rules were written for me; Admittedly, I had thought you yourself had written these rules as a response to one of my posts. But whether it was written by you or by Mr. Hammes (who I didn't know existed until you mentioned him), given that there is clearly a caveat in the tone, one can logically deduce what the post was aiming at. My comment was a response to the implied commentary as made by the poster of these rules (you), not as a show of narcissism. As I said, there was a caveat in your tone, aimed at me; I responded to the caveat and gave my opinion. It is very disconcerting to see an individual comparing an obvious response to an extreme form of narcissism~~

I posted them for your benefit, so you could learn. And you do need to learn. Sadly, it seems you are bulletproof even to the brilliance of Mr. Hammes. These were written most likely before you were born, not for you but for everyone. And while you can't seem to figure them out there are others who will.