03-15-2010, 07:02 AM
(03-15-2010, 06:24 AM)billy Wrote: FEMA's early investigation was revised by a later, more detailed investigation conducted by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), which also consulted outside engineering entities. This investigation was completed in September 2005. Like FEMA, NIST vindicated the design of the WTC, noting that the severity of the attacks and the magnitude of the destruction was beyond anything experienced in U.S. cities in the past. NIST also emphasized the role of the fires, but it did not attribute the collapses to failing floor joists. Instead, NIST found that sagging floors pulled inward on the perimeter columns: "This led to the inward bowing of the perimeter columns and failure of the south face of WTC 1 and the east face of WTC 2, initiating the collapse of each of the towers."[6]To answer your questions in bold aprox the same between the 2 jets without getting into numbers bill.
thing is the threads about was bin laden behind the plane hijacks. i'd say yes he was. for me the towers or how they fell is a different story. the reward for bin laden is for conspiracy to kill and in connection with the attacks on the twin towers. did the planes hit the towers, did bin laden play a role in getting the planes to hit the twin towers, for me those are the only questions that actually relate to bin laden.
but it's in general so i guess thats okay. i've said my piece about teh facts. i've also posted the above. i think bin laden had two jets fly into the towers and that made them fall. i think bin laden should be hunted down. i still havent seen any other FACTs other than the planes hitting and the towers coming down. i don't class a 60's test with a different plane as factual proof of anything. out of curiosity how much force does a thousand kilo have traveling at 350 mph?
how much force does 60 000 pounds of weight have traveling at that speed.
The fact is that the towers were in fact built to with stand both a crash and the heat from the fire. As to wether Osama had anything to do with it other than in name and face to put to terrorisim I really doubt it at this point. He will not be brought to trial. If anything he is already dead. If he is alive I would say that he will be killed before he will ever make it to trial. The part that is for sure is that he will never get a fair trial anywhere.
If the reward is in fact for a connection to the towers then what happened to them is in fact why I started this thread and it is. If he had nothing to the extent to do with it as he is portraid to then the whole story about the terrorist is a sham and needs to be exposed. A whole country has allowed their freedom to be taken away as a result of the so called attack from the terrorists who want to kill and destroy America.
Here is my question to you...Why do you insist on telling me that my information is not on topic?
