Interpretation...is it valid critique?

[milo]

I can supply you with the information, I can't supply you with more. Did you ever notice how often a cliché is said to be 'tired'?

You have no opinion but your own. Ergo, in your opinion art is not subjective. You don't sense that there is a non sequitur in that simple proposition? Take care: you may be deemed to be one of the thickos who have to be told to fuck off.

You didn't provide information you provided the same old cliche as axiomatic. Please provide this information to support the rediculous position.

No. Had you been able to understand, you would have. I prefer bed. (You were spelling 'ridiculous' incorrectly, weren't you? As a joke? Otherwise, perhaps the door is nearer than you think. If you can find it, that is. I couldn't.)

If you had bothered to read the thread you would have seen that I already stated the only new thing you offered - that if something is identity or definition it cannot be cliché. Other than that you just repeat the same cliché - art is subjective.

Art isn't subjective, it is possibly the most objective thing we as humans have knowledge of ever. Even mathematics yields to subjectivity in relativistic terms but not art.