06-25-2013, 09:32 AM
(06-25-2013, 06:19 AM)milo Wrote:(06-25-2013, 05:56 AM)rayheinrich Wrote:no matter how people will try, you cannot democratize quality, it is something that is inherent.(06-25-2013, 03:22 AM)Brownlie Wrote: Can you tell me why this is bad?
Ray runs on for a bit...
A workshop or committee will never be able to "vote" strength into the iron of a bridge and a poem is the same way.
You misunderstand. There's nothing about democratizing 'like' in my
comments. I said that there existed different sets of rules for judging it;
NOT that I would accept a vote. I sure as hell wouldn't. I happen to
like my set and I think everybody else is wrong. (Though I do happen to
agree with most of the rules of quite a few other people. Leanne, for
instance, I think most of her rules agree with mine. (She may have a
different opinion on this
, but again: it ain't no democracy.) (06-25-2013, 09:31 AM)Brownlie Wrote:(06-25-2013, 09:16 AM)rayheinrich Wrote:Efficiency and short are two different things. If a poem loses a subject, becomes redundant, or progresses into seething goop then I see your point. If readers are lazy and have A.D.D. like I do well that's another story.(06-25-2013, 06:16 AM)Brownlie Wrote: Was Emily dickinson a genius for her formal deviations or was she sloppy?Both
But dubbing her a genius transformed a lot of that sloppiness to genius.
Fine with me cause I love short. Wish more writers would learn that
from her.
I said I love short, not that that was my only criteria. There's lot's of
short that I don't like.
(06-25-2013, 06:30 AM)Brownlie Wrote: Can quality be objectified as iron?No, if meant literally; if meant metaphorically
you can link any damn thing you want and it will always be yes.
(Not that I have to like your 'yes'.)
(06-25-2013, 06:44 AM)Leanne Wrote:(06-25-2013, 02:59 AM)rayheinrich Wrote: "The DECADENT SHIRE!"
Enter not this shadow place, for within its nook love found no space. -- rhyme without meter to match, quite unbalanced
A shire so fallen in the cruelest sense. The regard of its caretaker
never holding any respect. -- unmitigated prose, with a vague generalisation ("cruelest sense") to boot
For innocent care was not rendered and selfish greed had taken over. -- tell, tell, tell
The spoils of this fallen dream became a twisted dying clover. -- what the? A good example of rhyme driving the word choice with no regard for meaning
It was sad to see but inevitably known. -- awkward, telly and vague
These were the lost memories of a reality so empty and alone. -- awkward, telly, vague and stupid
Even William Topaz McGonagall would have hung his head in shame at this one -- I do hope it's not by a well-regarded poet, Ray.
Well regarded by quite a few idiots who write execrable crap such as this.
(06-25-2013, 06:47 AM)milo Wrote:(06-25-2013, 06:30 AM)Brownlie Wrote: Can quality be objectified as iron?quality can be measured /in/ iron, it cannot be voted on it must be measured.
Poetry is more difficult but the idea is the same. No matter how many people /vote/ that a bad poem is good, it is not.
(06-25-2013, 06:44 AM)Leanne Wrote:A quick google reveals that it is from deep underground poetry. It received the following telling comments:(06-25-2013, 02:59 AM)rayheinrich Wrote: "The DECADENT SHIRE!"
Enter not this shadow place, for within its nook love found no space. -- rhyme without meter to match, quite unbalanced
A shire so fallen in the cruelest sense. The regard of its caretaker
never holding any respect. -- unmitigated prose, with a vague generalisation ("cruelest sense") to boot
For innocent care was not rendered and selfish greed had taken over. -- tell, tell, tell
The spoils of this fallen dream became a twisted dying clover. -- what the? A good example of rhyme driving the word choice with no regard for meaning
It was sad to see but inevitably known. -- awkward, telly and vague
These were the lost memories of a reality so empty and alone. -- awkward, telly, vague and stupid
Even William Topaz McGonagall would have hung his head in shame at this one -- I do hope it's not by a well-regarded poet, Ray.
"indeed, deep vortex man"
and "very good, very real"
The site advertises itself as "The Harder Side of Poetry"
L
O
L
!
!
!
I must come to the defense of DU. There ARE some good poets that
post their poetry there. (About 23 out of 1300, but who's counting?.)
all this useless beauty... but what the hell, why not?

