08-15-2012, 03:53 PM
(08-15-2012, 10:18 AM)Leanne Wrote:No. We both use terse to mean sparse, pithy laconic. It doesn't change its meaning when put before "verse" but I left out the hyphen. In this piece dale hits the reader with short, sharp jabs..,almost every line has a point or two within. As Often is the case with dale I find it hard to take breath between the pummeling thoughts. The reason I used the terse verse criticism should have been more clearly tongue in cheek(08-15-2012, 07:19 AM)tectak Wrote: We are open season for terse verse and I am terrified.I think your definition of "terse" differs quite a bit from mine... just sayin'...
Dale, on re-reading post-coffee, I think you can do away with the first stanza entirely.
because the thing is terse per point but has too many points. I am up for killing off a few but remain unsure of the veracity of the piece. It changes things for me if true....just saying......
Best,
tectak

